Thursday, September 22, 2016

Always On Politics review

I'm not even going to pretend that I'm the slightest bit interested in this year's election simply because it seems like we're pissing in the wind with all of this. With all of the negativity surfacing I find it hard to ignore the election simply because this election period is dramatically different from any seen before. It's always in your face, especially Donald Trump and his tweets. People tend to gravitate towards Trump because they perceive him to be honest and direct, which they find a change of pace. Trump supporters also like that he will go completely "off script" anytime he sees fit to throw some shade, which is unheard of in a presidential election. His sense of political correctness is non existent and that's what the people like. Even though i think that he's a little i'll have to agree with the thought's that Hannah presented in her blog. Trump can be pretty funny.
 Image result for donald trump crooked hillary tweets
Image result for donald trump crooked hillary tweets

When I saw this I immediately clicked on the account to see if it was verified and sure enough it was Trump Daddy in the flesh. I couldn't believe that he tweeted something so bold. This could've affected the politically race negatively but he didn't give a damn and did it anyway. With Trump being so open and reckless on social media it almost becomes appealing to a younger generation, spiking our interest. If you think about it he's sort of a rebel and most of us are in our rebel phase. His recklessness on social media allows the younger generation entertainment while allowing him a doorway to push content towards us pertaining to his plans and goals as president. Though i am not a supporter his methods are sort of crafty.
Obviously Hilary can't get away with this because people find it hard to trust the words coming out of her mouth. This is why she has to push her content in a different manner.

Oh Instagram

Oh Instagram, how we love and hate you all at the same time. We tend to love you when Kim Kardashian West post her selfies while turning her backside to the camera, reminding us that she can afford an amazing plastic surgeon. We tend to love you when we see Snoop floating in the clouds. It reminds us of why we continue to drive to Colorado every time we get a break from school. However, we almost want to delete our account when DJ Khaled talks reminds us to, "Put some RESPEK on it". I don't understand any of this! Why is flaunting your body on social media conditionally acceptable? How is Snoop Dogg allowed to the worlds strongest weed before our very eyes and not share or be arrested? How is DJ Khaled still relevant in 2016 while annoying screaming "We da best" over every song that he produces? I don't find any of this entertaining and i'm not quite sure why others do, which is why i invest my time and effort in other places and things.

I'm honestly not the modern definition of "cool" anymore and i'm starting to see this. I blame it on college simply because in high school I was able to follow the lives of celebrities, view the latest twitter drama, and know all of the latest dance moves, while maintaining a decent GPA. Now I find this not only difficult but i don't have the same desires. As a college student I've realized that my time is precious and i'm not going to waste it on non-sense. If i'm on social media in the middle of the day i'm probably looking up current events for class or studying on Quizlet.com. While on campus I feel as if i'm surrounded by intelligent people who want to have intelligent conversations. Even when we are relaxing our subject matter isn't as pointless as Kim K's latest booty pic or Snoop's super weed. We talk about issues going on in the world, our futures, and actual life; things of importance. That just may be the thing now that I think of it. I'm at a point in life where i find myself putting away childish things which is why I only use to see content and not broadcast as much.

I'm sure to all three of the celebrities that i mentioned earlier they are doing their jobs, hobbies, etc but to me it all looks like non-sense. You shouldn't have to advertise that you're better than everyone else by smoking weed. It's a normal thing that millions of Americans do. So what if you have an outrageous ass? You don't have to continuously remind us. That thing is so big it'll advertise itself just fine. DJ Khaled isn't "da best" , no disRESPEK. Just because you say it on every album doesn't make it true. At the end of the day i don't really know the intended goal of the celebrities but i do know that because I'm not amused and entertained by their post I'm pretty lame.

Tuesday, September 13, 2016

Gifting Response Post

So the blog post regarding Gifting that I found most interesting come from....

Megan Larsen http://meganlarsen.blogspot.com/ @megannlarsen15
Tyler Rentfro http://tfro18.blogspot.com/ @bj_for_prez
While reading their different point of views I noticed that there were many common ideas that I've always heard about gifting. Let's take Rentfro's post for example. He states, " I personally do not believe anyone gives as they say, "from the bottom of their heart", and doesn't expect anything in return." He later on gives an scenario in which a local church is doing "the Lords work", feeding a homeless man and claiming that they expecting nothing in return but in actuality hope to see the homeless man in church. When you take a moment to step back and analyze the scenario one could agree with Rentfro's point of view because the church either expects the homeless man to come to God through them or to change his life. This point of view often leads others to believe that humanity is selfish in the sense that they giving gifts for no reason creates a positive stimulus within the body in which we crave. Basically, we give gifts just to feel good about ourselves which makes it a selfish act. Megan's post had a similar idea behind it but she took it a different direction by saying that gifting isn't limited only to physical objects and that social media can be used as a tool to give gifts to the world. Personally I'm not a true blogger because I don't care for the opinions of others typed up in paragraphs with a 12 pt font, nor do I believe anyone else actually care for my opinion on gifting in the last paragraph of this page. I also use places like instagram to post pictures for my friends to like which makes me feel good. I don't consider it a gift but I guess that some could see it that way. This is why I can agree with Megan's point of view and Renfro's as well.
As I dove into Matt's post I was thinking he'd share the same ideology about gifting as Rentfro and he did, but in a different way. Though Matt believes that the idea of gifting is selfish he went a different direction with it by making the claim, " Gifting gives power over someone else, you gave them something they didn't have before or you shared a social media post that they would have never seen if you had not shared. All of these "gifts" give power over someone making them higher on the social ladder. " Now this is something else huh! I never looked at gift giving as some sort of power. Then I remembered how shitty I felt when my ex girlfriend got me something for our 6th month mark after we agreed not to exchange gifts. She whipped out the gift and the looked around the room as if I was hiding her gift somewhere out of site. Let's just say she stormed out of my front door pissed off after the movie I put on finished. I knew then that I had to get her a gift or she'd hold that over my head forever, or at least until I did something else wrong. The notion that gifting gives a person power isn't too crazy of an idea and is something that I could potentially get behind.
Now here's the part you've a been waiting for where Damn Danny gives his point of view on gifting. I'm about to sound life a real nerd because I pulled my idea of gifting from a popular Anime television show titled "Full Metal Alchemist". In order for you to understand where i'm going with this i'm going to have to break it down for you.

1. Alchemy is the science of understanding the structure of matter, breaking it down, then reconstructing it as something else. It can even make gold from lead. But alchemy is a science, so it must follow the natural laws: To create, something of equal value must be lost. This is the principle of Equivalent Exchange.

STAY WITH ME NOW!!

The idea of equivalent exchange isn't too far fetched is it? Even though it's a term used in science it seems to hold true for humanity. There is nothing on this earth that we do in which we don't expect anything in return. I believe that this is part of the natural balance of the universe. Just think about it, the world is give and take. A honey bee wakes up everyday knowing that it will be able to drink the sweet nectar from a rose on a bush. The plant in return is pollinated by the bee and continues to live on. I bet that bee doesn't consciously know it's helping in the pollinating process but he sure feels good as hell when his belly is full of nectar. The plants are also able to continue their pollination cycles which allows them to exist a little while longer. There was an equivalent exchange that took place there and it happens with everything in this universe, especially in humanity. Full metal Alchemist makes a statement at the beginning of every episode that says....
 
2. Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's first law of Equivalent Exchange.

Whether you are gaining something physical or gaining satisfaction gifting is stemmed from the natural balance of the universe, equivalent exchange. Which is why you feel obligated to give gifts in return when you receive one. BOOM! MIND BLOWN!
 

Friday, September 9, 2016

Let's talk about Wikipedia

Let me first start off by saying the old days of Wikipedia not being a credible source are long gone. I don't care what your high school teachers told you, they're all liars. They had you convinced that Christopher Columbus discovered America and you see how that turned out. With that being said I remember writing short essays for classes and having to use a few internet resources to prove my information credible. Finding the right information for my essay was always easy because Wikipedia was notorious for having the goods. The hard part however, was looking for random websites that generally presented the same information that I used in my actual essay. With that being said I never once had any teacher say that my information wasn't credible which means that the information isn't necessarily wrong. It's just too easy to find and if everyone used Wikipedia all essays would generally be the same.
Personally I only use Wikipedia as a tool to verify or find quick information of the most random things. Don't act like you've never done the same thing. Especially when you get in your "let's be a creeper" type of mood, looking up when and where Zac Efron was born so you can resolve your high school musical fetish. I tend to look up Hollywood actors and actresses from old tv shows that I grew up watching mainly to verify ages and to learn more about their careers, personally lives, and siblings.
So is Wikipedia creditable? Yes! Should you use it for essays and other school things? Yes, but don't get caught. If you're using turnitin.com pray over your essay and say like 20 hail mary's and you should be in the clear of plagiarism.